Lorry cartel lawsuit moves forward
The Competition Appeal Tribunal has handed down a judgment approving the Road Haulage Association’s application for a Collective Proceedings Order in respect of damages claims arising out of the European Commission’s Trucks cartel decision, reports Backhouse Jones solicitors, one of two teams of solicitors acting on behalf of RHA. The RHA seeks to represent all claimants who want to sign up for a follow-on damages action relating to the cartel in medium and heavy trucks which took place between MAN, Volvo/Renault, Daimler, IVECO (now Stellantis) and DAF over a 14-year period between 1997 and 2011.
The CAT gave approval for the claim to proceed.
The RHA has over 18,000 claimants signed up and registered already and will shortly be inviting any other qualifying operators to join the claim. The estimated value of the claim is in excess of GBP2 billion.
The Tribunal has determined:
- that the RHA application for certification should be granted to bring collective proceedings on an opt-in basis
- with respect to claims in respect of trucks registered in the UK
- being both new and pre-owned trucks
- for contracts entered into between 17 January 1997 and 31 January 2014 for new trucks; and
- for contracts entered into between 17 January 1997 and 31 January 2015 for pre-owned trucks.
A rival application for a collective proceedings order on an opt-out basis brought by an SPV, UK Trucks Limited, was rejected by the Tribunal. The RHA’s claim arises out of the decision on 19 July 2016 (Case 39824 – Trucks) by the European Commission, which found that five major European truck manufacturing groups — DAF, Daimler, IVECO, Volvo/Renault and MAN (together the OEMs) — had carried out a single continuous infringement of Article 101 of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement over a period of 14-year period between 1997 and 2011. Four of the five OEMs were fined over EUR2.9bn.
MAN was granted immunity from a further fine of EUR1.2bn for having revealed the existence of the cartel. A sixth manufacturer, Scania, did not participate in the settlement and is appealing a separate decision on 27 September 2017, which found it had participated in the cartel and under which it was fined EUR880m. The OEMs were found to have exchanged information on future gross prices and colluded on the timing and passing on of costs of the introduction of emission technologies required by EURO III to VI standards for trucks weighing six or more tonnes (referred to as medium and heavy trucks).
The RHA filed its application on 17 July 2018 against IVECO, MAN and DAF and seeks to bring collective proceedings on an opt-in basis. The RHA is represented by Steven Meyerhoff (director) and James Lomax (associate director) of Backhouse Jones and Addleshaw Goddard, partners Mark Molyneux, Bruce Kilpatrick and Samantha Haigh. Counsel are, James Flynn QC and Emma Mockford of Brick Court Chambers and David Went of Exchange Chambers.
The RHA has instructed Dr Peter Davies as expert in the proceedings. Bruce Kilpatrick, partner at Addleshaw Goddard, commenting on the action, said: “This is the first time the CAT has certified an application for a collective proceedings order on an “opt in” basis and the judgment provides welcome clarity on a number of key issues. There will now be an opportunity for customers (including businesses which have suffered loss as a result of the trucks cartel but which have not yet signed up to the RHA claim) to recover damages in a cost effective manner, without having to bring a claim in their own name.”